<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 94% of all email is spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.getsafeonlineblog.org/94-of-all-email-is-spam/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.getsafeonlineblog.org/94-of-all-email-is-spam</link>
	<description>News, tips and updates from the GetSafeOnline.org team</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 11:39:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The PrivacyHarbor Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.getsafeonlineblog.org/94-of-all-email-is-spam/comment-page-1#comment-446911</link>
		<dc:creator>The PrivacyHarbor Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 17:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getsafeonlineblog.org/94-of-all-email-is-spam#comment-446911</guid>
		<description>[...] the ways hackers dupe new email users and propagate spam to the point where spam now accounts for 94% of all emails [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the ways hackers dupe new email users and propagate spam to the point where spam now accounts for 94% of all emails [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maythil</title>
		<link>http://www.getsafeonlineblog.org/94-of-all-email-is-spam/comment-page-1#comment-402137</link>
		<dc:creator>maythil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getsafeonlineblog.org/94-of-all-email-is-spam#comment-402137</guid>
		<description>Ironically, i reached this page from msn.com which really has no efficient means to stop spamming. To the statistics, I will add one more obeservation. Almost all the spam letters at my msn address are about viagra.  and gmail is the single biggest source of spamming, thanks to the spamming epidemics kickstarted by google&#039;s group mailing through &#039;orkut&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ironically, i reached this page from msn.com which really has no efficient means to stop spamming. To the statistics, I will add one more obeservation. Almost all the spam letters at my msn address are about viagra.  and gmail is the single biggest source of spamming, thanks to the spamming epidemics kickstarted by google&#8217;s group mailing through &#8216;orkut&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MJ Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.getsafeonlineblog.org/94-of-all-email-is-spam/comment-page-1#comment-401084</link>
		<dc:creator>MJ Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:14:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.getsafeonlineblog.org/94-of-all-email-is-spam#comment-401084</guid>
		<description>The guide doesn&#039;t mention whitelisting - filtering known email addresses into a high-priority inbox - which is a key tactic keeping email useful despite spam.

I feel that the guide should probably also mention that it&#039;s better for UK people to use UK-hosted (or at least EU-hosted) email because they&#039;re more easily reachable under our laws.  Also, the large webmail services like hotmail are targets for spam-harvesters (I know people who have opened a hotmail account, not published the address anywhere, yet still started getting spam). 

Finally, Yahoo!s anti-spam tactics are harmful to other mailservers, as I&#039;ve mentioned on our website in the past.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guide doesn&#8217;t mention whitelisting &#8211; filtering known email addresses into a high-priority inbox &#8211; which is a key tactic keeping email useful despite spam.</p>
<p>I feel that the guide should probably also mention that it&#8217;s better for UK people to use UK-hosted (or at least EU-hosted) email because they&#8217;re more easily reachable under our laws.  Also, the large webmail services like hotmail are targets for spam-harvesters (I know people who have opened a hotmail account, not published the address anywhere, yet still started getting spam). </p>
<p>Finally, Yahoo!s anti-spam tactics are harmful to other mailservers, as I&#8217;ve mentioned on our website in the past.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

